Simone Smith
The Virology Journal – the official publication of Dr. Fauci’s National Institutes of Health – published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22, 2005, under the heading “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.”
They report that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantages.
Dr. Fauci has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). The article states, and Dr. Fauci has known that HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.
The question for readers right now is if this drug was proven to help with the symptoms and act as a vaccine, why was this hidden from the public for so long? Why were doctors who promoted this drugged: ridiculed, censored, and denounced in the media?
In 2005, stated, “Concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” It was also established that Fauci’s chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.
During an appearance on CNN last spring, Fauci warned the network’s handful of viewers that using HCQ prophylactically as then-President Donald Trump had done was dangerous, despite the fact that the drug has been used for decades without issue. This of course is a direct contradiction of what he had stated before.
For those who don’t know, in 2013, Fauci promoted the use of HCQ in the treatment of MERS, another type of coronavirus similar to SARS and the Wuhan Flu.
Everywhere we turn, the truth is revealing itself. As media consumers, we just have to pay attention.
